Biomechanics aware headgear

ABSTRACT

Protective gear includes an outer shell layer connected to a middle shell layer through an outer energy and impact transformer layer. The middle shell layer is connected to an inner shell layer through an inner energy and impact transformer layer. The outer and inner energy and impact transformer layers flexibly connect the shell layers to absorb impact forces, rotational forces, shear forces, etc., and allow the various shell layers to move and slide relative to the other shell layers. The outer and inner energy and impact transformer layers may be constructed using gels, fluids, electro-rheological elements, magneto-rheological elements, etc. The protective gear may be formed as helmets or body protection for various activities and protect users from not only impact and penetrative forces, but rotational and shear forces as well.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELAYED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of and claims benefit under 35 U.S.C.§120 to U.S. application Ser. No. 15/202,173, entitled BIOMECHANICSAWARE HEADGEAR, filed Jul. 5, 2016 (Attorney Docket No. BRGDP001C7),which is a continuation of and claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 toU.S. application Ser. No. 15/050,373, entitled BIOMECHANICS AWAREHEADGEAR, filed Feb. 22, 2016 (Attorney Docket No. BRGDP001C6), and toU.S. application Ser. No. 15/050,357, entitled BIOMECHANICS AWAREHELMET, filed Feb. 22, 2016 (Attorney Docket No. BRGDP001C5), which arecontinuations of and claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 to U.S.application Ser. No. 14/927,093, entitled BIOMECHANICS AWARE HELMET,filed Oct. 29, 2015 (Attorney Docket No. BRGDP001C4), which is acontinuation of and claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 to U.S.application Ser. No. 14/809,142, entitled BIOMECHANICS AWARE HELMET,filed Jul. 24, 2015 (Attorney Docket No. BRGDP001C3), which is acontinuation of and claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 to U.S.application Ser. No. 14/714,093, entitled BIOMECHANICS AWARE PROTECTIVEGEAR, filed May 15, 2015 (Attorney Docket No. BRGDP001C2), which is acontinuation of and claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 to U.S.application Ser. No. 14/485,993, entitled BIOMECHANICS AWARE HELMET,filed Sep. 15, 2014, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,060,561 on Jun. 23,2015 (Attorney Docket No. BRGDP001C1), which is a continuation of andclaims benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 to U.S. application Ser. No.13/554,471, entitled BIOMECHANICS AWARE PROTECTIVE GEAR, filed Jul. 20,2012, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,863,319 on Oct. 21, 2014 (AttorneyDocket No. BRGDP001), which claims priority to U.S. Provisional PatentApplication No. 61/510,401, entitled SMART BIOMECHANICS AWARE ENERGYCONSCIOUS PROTECTIVE GEAR WITH TISSUE PROTECTION, filed on Jul. 21, 2011(Attorney Docket No. BRGDP001P), all of which are incorporated herein byreference for all purposes.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to biomechanics aware protective gear.

DESCRIPTION OF RELATED ART

Protective gear such as sports and safety helmets are designed to reducedirect impact forces that can mechanically damage an area of contact.Protective gear will typically include padding and a protective shell toreduce the risk of physical head injury. Liners are provided beneath ahardened exterior shell to reduce violent deceleration of the head in asmooth uniform manner and in an extremely short distance, as linerthickness is typically limited based on helmet size considerations.

Protective gear is reasonably effective in preventing injury.Nonetheless, the effectiveness of protective gear remains limited.Consequently, various mechanisms are provided to improve protective gearin a biomechanically aware manner.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The disclosure may best be understood by reference to the followingdescription taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, whichillustrate particular embodiments.

FIG. 1 illustrates types of forces on axonal fibers.

FIG. 2 illustrates one example of a piece of protective gear.

FIG. 3 illustrates one example of a container device system.

FIG. 4 illustrates another example of a container device system.

FIG. 5 illustrates one example of a multiple shell system.

FIG. 6 illustrates one example of a multiple shell helmet.

DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS

Reference will now be made in detail to some specific examples of theinvention including the best modes contemplated by the inventors forcarrying out the invention. Examples of these specific embodiments areillustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention isdescribed in conjunction with these specific embodiments, it will beunderstood that it is not intended to limit the invention to thedescribed embodiments. On the contrary, it is intended to coveralternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included withinthe spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

For example, the techniques of the present invention will be describedin the context of helmets. However, it should be noted that thetechniques of the present invention apply to a wide variety of differentpieces of protective gear. In the following description, numerousspecific details are set forth in order to provide a thoroughunderstanding of the present invention. Particular example embodimentsof the present invention may be implemented without some or all of thesespecific details. In other instances, well known process operations havenot been described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure thepresent invention.

Various techniques and mechanisms of the present invention willsometimes be described in singular form for clarity. However, it shouldbe noted that some embodiments include multiple iterations of atechnique or multiple instantiations of a mechanism unless notedotherwise. For example, a protective device may use a single strap in avariety of contexts. However, it will be appreciated that a system canuse multiple straps while remaining within the scope of the presentinvention unless otherwise noted. Furthermore, the techniques andmechanisms of the present invention will sometimes describe a connectionbetween two entities. It should be noted that a connection between twoentities does not necessarily mean a direct, unimpeded connection, as avariety of other entities may reside between the two entities. Forexample, different layers may be connected using a variety of materials.Consequently, a connection does not necessarily mean a direct, unimpededconnection unless otherwise noted.

Overview

Protective gear includes an outer shell layer connected to a middleshell layer through an outer energy and impact transformer layer. Themiddle shell layer is connected to an inner shell layer through an innerenergy and impact transformer layer. The outer and inner energy andimpact transformer layers flexibly connect the shell layers to absorbimpact forces, rotational forces, shear forces, etc., and allow thevarious shell layers to move and slide relative to the other shelllayers. The outer and inner energy and impact transformer layers may beconstructed using gels, fluids, electro-rheological elements,magneto-rheological elements, etc. The protective gear may be formed ashelmets or body protection for various activities and may be used toprotect users from not only impact and penetrative forces, butrotational and shear forces as well.

Example Embodiments

Protective gear such as knee pads, shoulder pads, and helmets aretypically designed to prevent direct impact injuries or trauma. Forexample, many pieces of protective gear reduce full impact forces thatcan structurally damage an area of contact such as the skull or knee.Major emphasis is placed on reducing the likelihood of cracking orbreaking of bone. However, the larger issue is preventing the tissue andneurological damage caused by rotational forces, shear forces,oscillations, and tension/compression forces.

For head injuries, the major issue is neurological damage caused byoscillations of the brain in the cranial vault resulting incoup-contracoup injuries manifested as direct contusions to the centralnervous system (CNS), shear injuries exacerbated by rotational, tension,compression, and /or shear forces resulting in demyelination and tearingof axonal fibers; and subdural or epidural hematomas. Because of theemphasis in reducing the likelihood of cracking or breaking bone, manypieces of protective gear do not sufficiently dampen, transform,dissipate, and/or distribute the rotational, tension, compression,and/or shear forces, but rather focus on absorbing the direct impactforces over a small area, potentially exacerbating the secondary forceson the CNS. Initial mechanical damage results in a secondary cascade oftissue and cellular damage due to increased glutamate release or othertrauma induced molecular cascades.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has immense personal, societal and economicimpact. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention documented 1.4million cases of TBI in the USA in 2007. This number was based onpatients with a loss of consciousness from a TBI resulting in anEmergency Room visit. With increasing public awareness of TBI thisnumber increased to 1.7 million cases in 2010. Of these cases there were52,000 deaths and 275,000 hospitalizations, with the remaining 1.35million cases released from the ER. Of these 1.35 million dischargedcases at least 150,000 people will have significant residual cognitiveand behavioral problems at 1-year post discharge from the ER. Notably,the CDC believes these numbers under represent the problem since manypatients do not seek medical evaluation for brief loss of consciousnessdue to a TBI. These USA numbers are similar to those observed in otherdeveloped countries and are likely higher in third-world countries withpoorer vehicle and head impact protection. To put the problem in aclearer perspective, the World Health Organization (WHO) anticipatesthat TBI will become a leading cause of death and disability in theworld by the year 2020.

The CDC numbers do not include head injuries from military actions.Traumatic brain injury is widely cited as the “signature injury” ofOperation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom. The nature ofwarfare conducted in Iraq and Afghanistan is different from that ofprevious wars and advances in protective gear including helmets as wellas improved medical response times allow soldiers to survive events suchas head wounds and blast exposures that previously would have provenfatal. The introduction of the Kevlar helmet has drastically reducedfield deaths from bullet and shrapnel wounds to the head. However, thisincrease in survival is paralleled by a dramatic increase in residualbrain injury from compression and rotational forces to the brain in TBIsurvivors. Similar to that observed in the civilian population theresidual effects of military deployment related TBI are neurobehavioralsymptoms such as cognitive deficits and emotional and somaticcomplaints. The statistics provided by the military cite an incidence of6.2% of head injuries in combat zone veterans. One might expect thesenumbers to hold in other countries.

In addition to the incidence of TBI in civilians from falls andvehicular accidents or military personnel in combat there is increasingawareness that sports-related repetitive forces applied to the head withor without true loss of consciousness can have dire long-termconsequences. It has been known since the 1920's that boxing isassociated with devastating long-term issues including “dementiapugilistica” and Parkinson-like symptoms (i.e. Mohammed Ali). We nowknow that this repetitive force on the brain dysfunction extends to manyother sports. Football leads the way in concussions with loss ofconsciousness and post-traumatic memory loss (63% of all concussions inall sports), wrestling comes in second at 10% and soccer has risen to 6%of all sports related TBIs. In the USA 63,000 high school studentssuffer a TBI per year and many of these students have persistentlong-term cognitive and behavioral issues. This disturbing patternextends to professional sports where impact forces to the body and headare even higher due to the progressive increase in weight and speed ofprofessional athletes. Football has dominated the national discourse inthe area but serious and progressive long-term neurological issues arealso seen in hockey and soccer players and in any sport with thelikelihood of a TBI. Repetitive head injuries result in progressiveneurological deterioration with neuropathological findings mimickingAlzheimer's disease. This syndrome with characteristic post-mortemneuropathological findings on increases in Tau proteins and amyloidplaques is referred to as Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE).

The human brain is a relatively delicate organ weighing about 3 poundsand having a consistency a little denser than gelatin and close to thatof the liver. From an evolutionary perspective, the brain and theprotective skull were not designed to withstand significant externalforces. Because of this poor impact resistance design, external forcestransmitted through the skull to the brain that is composed of over 100billion cells and up to a trillion connecting fibers results in majorneurological problems. These injuries include contusions that directlydestroy brain cells and tear the critical connecting fibers necessary totransmit information between brain cells.

Contusion injuries are simply bleeding into the substance of the braindue to direct contact between the brain and the bony ridges of theinside of the skull. Unfortunately, the brain cannot tolerate bloodproducts and the presence of blood kicks off a biological cascade thatfurther damages the brain. Contusions are due to the brain oscillatinginside the skull when an external force is applied. These oscillationscan include up to three cycles back and forth in the cranial vault andare referred to as coup-contra coup injuries. The coup part of theprocess is the point of contact of the brain with the skull and thecontra-coup is the next point of contact when the brain oscillates andstrikes the opposite part of the inside of the skull.

The inside of the skull has a series of sharp bony ridges in the frontof the skull and when the brain is banged against these ridges it ismechanically torn resulting in a contusion. These contusion injuries aretypically in the front of the brain damaging key regions involved incognitive and emotional control.

Shear injuries involve tearing of axonal fibers. The brain and itsaxonal fibers are extremely sensitive to rotational forces. Boxers canwithstand hundreds of punches directly in the face but a singleround-house punch or upper cut where the force comes in from the side orbottom of the jaw will cause acute rotation of the skull and brain andtypically a knock-out. If the rotational forces are severe enough, theresult is tearing of axons.

FIG. 1 below shows how different forces affect axons. Compression 101and tension 103 can remove the protective coating on an axon referred toas a myelin sheath. The myelin can be viewed as the rubber coating on awire. If the internal wire of the axon is not cut the myelin can re-growand re-coat the “wire” which can resume axonal function and braincommunication. If rotational forces are significant, shear forces 105tear the axon. This elevates the problem since the ends of cut axons donot re-attach. This results in a permanent neurological deficit and isreferred to as diffuse axonal injury (DAI), a major cause of long-termneurological disability after TBI.

Some more modem pieces of protective gear have been introduced with theawareness that significant injuries besides musculoskeletal or fleshinjuries in a variety of activities require new protective gear designs.

U.S. Pat. No. 7,076,811 issued to Puchalski describes a helmet with animpact absorbing crumple or shear zone. “The shell consists of three (ormore) discrete panels that are physically and firmly coupled togetherproviding rigid protection under most circumstances, but upon impact thepanels move relative to one another, but not relative to the user'shead, thereby permitting impact forces to be dissipated and/orredirected away from the cranium and brain within. Upon impact to thehelmet, there are sequential stages of movement of the panels relativeto each other, these movements initially being recoverable, but withsufficient vector forces the helmet undergoes structural changes in apre-determined fashion, so that the recoverable and permanent movementscumulatively provide a protective ‘crumple zone’ or ‘shear zone’.”

U.S. Pat. No. 5,815,846 issued to Calonge describes “An impact resistanthelmet assembly having a first material layer coupled to a secondmaterial layer so as to define a gas chamber therebetween which containsa quantity that provides impact dampening upon an impact force beingapplied to the helmet assembly. The helmet assembly further includes acontainment layer disposed over the second material layer and structuredto define a fluid chamber in which a quantity of fluid is disposed. Thefluid includes a generally viscous gel structured to provide someresistance against disbursement from an impacted region of the fluidchamber to non-impacted regions of the fluid chamber, thereby furtherenhance the impact distribution and dampening of the impact forceprovided by the helmet assembly.”

U.S. Pat. No. 5,956,777 issued to Popovich describes “A helmet forprotecting a head by laterally displacing impact forces, said helmetcomprising: a rigid inner shell formed as a single unit; a resilientspacing layer disposed outside of and in contact with said inner shell;and an articulated shell having a plurality of discrete rigid segmentsdisposed outside of and in contact with said resilient spacing layer anda plurality of resilient members which couple adjacent ones of saidrigid segments to one another.”

U.S. Pat. No. 6,434,755 issued to Halstead describes a football helmetwith liner sections of different thicknesses and densities. The thicker,softer sections would handle less intense impacts, crushing down untilthe thinner, harder sections take over to prevent bottoming out.

Still other ideas relate to using springs instead of crushable materialsto manage the energy of an impact. Springs are typically associated withrebound, and energy stored by the spring is returned to the head. Thismay help in some instances, but can still cause significant neurologicalinjury. Avoiding energy return to the head is a reason thatnon-rebounding materials are typically used.

Some of the protective gear mechanisms are not sufficientlybiomechanically aware and are not sufficiently customized for particularareas of protection. These protective gear mechanisms also are notsufficiently active at the right time scales to avoid damage. Forexample, in many instances, materials like gels may only start toconvert significant energy into heat after significant energy has beentransferred to the brain. Similarly, structural deformation mechanismsmay only break and absorb energy after a significant amount of energyhas been transferred to the brain.

Current mechanisms are useful for particular circumstances but arelimited in their ability to protect against numerous types ofneurological damage. Consequently, an improved smart biomechanics awareand energy conscious protective gear mechanism is provided to protectagainst mechanical damage as well as neurological damage.

According to various embodiments, protective gear such as a helmetincludes a container device to provide a structural mechanism forholding an energy and impact transformer. The design of this elementcould be a part of the smart energy conscious biomechanics aware designfor protection. The energy and impact transformer includes a mechanismfor the dissipation, transformation, absorption, redirection orforce/energy at the right time scales (in some cases as small as a fewmilliseconds or hundreds of microseconds).

In particular embodiments, the container mechanism provides structure toallow use of an energy and impact transformer. The container mechanismmay be two or three shells holding one or more layers of energy andimpact transformer materials. That is, a multiple shell structure mayhave energy and impact transformer materials between adjacent shelllayers. The shells may be designed to prevent direct penetration fromany intruding or impeding object. In some examples, the outer shell maybe associated with mechanisms for impact distribution, energytransformation, force dampening, and shear deflection andtransformation. In some examples, the container mechanism can beconstructed of materials such as polycarbonate, fiberglass, Kevlar,metal, alloys, combinations of materials, etc.

According to various embodiments, the energy and impact transformerprovides a mechanism for the dissipation, transformation, absorption,and redirection of force and energy at the appropriate time scales. Theenergy and impact transformer may include a variety of elements. In someexamples, a mechanical transformer element connects multiple shellsassociated with a container mechanism with mechanical structures orfluids that help transform the impact or shear forces on an outer shellinto more benign forces or energy instead of transferring the impact orshear forces onto an inner shell.

In some examples, a mechanical transformer layer is provided betweeneach pair of adjacent shells. The mechanical transform may use a sheartruss-like structure connecting an outer shell and an inner shell thatdampens any force or impact. In some examples, shear truss structurelayers connect an outer shell to a middle shell and the middle shell toan inner shell. According to various embodiments, the middle shell orcenter shell may slide relative to the inner shell and reduce themovement and/or impact imparted on an outer shell. In particularembodiments, the outer shell may slide up to several centimetersrelative to the middle shell. In particular embodiments, the materialused for connecting the middle shell to the outer shell or the innershell could be a material that absorbs/dissipates mechanical energy asthermal energy or transformational energy. The space between the outershell, the middle shell, and the inner shell can be filled withabsorptive/dissipative material such as fluids and gels.

According to various embodiments, the energy and impact transformer mayalso include an electro-rheological element. Different shells may beseparated by an electro-rheological element with electric fielddependent viscosity. The element may essentially stay solid most of thetime. When there is stress/strain on an outer shell, the electric fieldis activated so that the viscosity changes depending on the level ofstress/strain. Shear forces on an inner shell are reduced to minimizeimpact transmission.

In particular embodiments, the energy and impact transformer alsoincludes a magneto-rheological element. Various shells may be separatedby magneto rheological elements with magnetic field dependent viscosity.The element may essentially stay solid most of the time. When there isstress/strain on an outer shell, the magnetic field is activated so thatthe viscosity changes depending on the level of stress/strain. Shearforces on an inner shell are reduced to minimize impact transmission.

Electro-rheological and magneto-rheological elements may include smartfluids with properties that change in the presence of electric field ora magnetic field. Some smart fluids undergo changes in viscosity when amagnetic field is applied. For example, a smart fluid may change from aliquid to a gel when magnets line up to create a magnetic field. Smartfluids may react within milliseconds to reduce impact and shear forcesbetween shells.

In other examples, foam and memory foam type elements may be included toabsorb and distribute forces. In some examples, foam and memory foamtype elements may reside beneath the inner shell. A magnetic suspensionelement may be used to actively or passively reduce external forces. Aninner core and an outer core may be separated by magnets that resisteach other, e.g. N-poles opposing each other. The inner and outer coresnaturally would want to move apart, but are pulled together by elasticmaterials. When an outer shell is impact and the magnets are pushedcloser, forces between the magnets increase through the air gap.

According to various embodiments, a concentric geodesic dome elementincludes a series of inner shells, each of which is a truss basedgeodesic dome, but connected to the outer geodesic through structural orfluidic mechanisms. This allows each geodesic structure to fullydistribute its own shock load and transmit it in a uniform manner to thedome underneath. The sequence of geodesic structures and the separationby fluid provides uniform force distribution and/or dissipation thatprotects the inner most shell from these impacts.

In particular embodiments, a fluid/accordion element would separate aninner shell and an outer shell using an accordion with fluid/gel inbetween. This would allow shock from the outer core to be transmittedand distributed through the enclosed fluid uniformly while the accordioncompresses to accommodate strain. A compressed fluid/piston/springelement could include piston/cylinder like elements with a compressedfluid in between that absorbs the impact energy while increasing theresistance to the applied force. The design could include additionalmechanical elements like a spring to absorb/dissipate the energy.

In still other examples, a fiber element involves using a rippled outershell with texture like that of a coconut. The outer shell may containdense coconut fiber like elements that separate the inner core from theouter core. The shock can be absorbed by the outer core and the fibrousfilling. Other elements may also be included in an inner core structure.In some examples, a thick stretchable gel filled bag wrapped around theinner shell could expand and contract in different areas toinstantaneously transfer and distribute forces. The combination of theelasticity of a bag and the viscosity of the gel could provide forcushioning to absorb/dissipate external forces.

According to various embodiments, a container device includes multipleshells such as an outer shell, a middle shell, and an inner shell. Theshells may be separated by energy and impact transformer mechanisms. Insome examples, the shells and the energy and impact transformermechanisms can be integrated or a shell can also operate as an energyand impact transformer.

FIG. 2 illustrates one example of a particular piece of protective gear.Helmet 201 includes a shell layer 211 and a lining layer 213. The shelllayer 211 includes attachment points 215 for a visor, chin bar, faceguard, face cage, or face protection mechanism generally. In someexamples, the shell layer 211 includes ridges 217 and/or air holes forbreathability. The shell layer 211 may be constructed using plastics,resins, metal, composites, etc. In some instances, the shell layer 211may be reinforced using fibers such as aramids. The shell layer 211helps to distribute mechanical energy and prevent penetration. The shelllayer 211 is typically made using lighter weight materials to preventthe helmet itself from causing injury.

According to various embodiments, a chin strap 221 is connected to thehelmet to secure helmet positioning. The shell layer 211 is alsosometimes referred to as a container or a casing. In many examples, theshell layer 211 covers a lining layer 213. The lining layer 213 mayinclude lining materials, foam, and/or padding to absorb mechanicalenergy and enhance fit. A lining layer 213 may be connected to the shelllayer 211 using a variety of attachment mechanisms such as glue orVelcro. According to various embodiments, the lining layer 213 ispre-molded to allow for enhanced fit and protection. According tovarious embodiments, the lining layer may vary, e.g. from 4 mm to 40 mmin thickness, depending on the type of activity a helmet is designedfor. In some examples, custom foam may be injected into a fitted helmetto allow for personalized fit. In other examples, differently sizedshell layers and lining layers may be provided for various activitiesand head sizes.

The shell layer 211 and lining layer 213 protect the skull nicely andhave resulted in a dramatic reduction in skull fractures and bleedingbetween the skull and the brain (subdural and epidural hematomas).Military helmets use Kevlar to decrease penetrating injuries frombullets, shrapnel etc. Unfortunately, these approaches are not welldesigned to decrease direct forces and resultant coup-contra coupinjuries that result in both contusions and compression-tension axoninjuries. Furthermore, many helmets do not protect against rotationalforces that are a core cause of a shear injury and resultant long-termneurological disability in civilian and military personnel. Although theintroduction of Kevlar in military helmets has decreased mortality frompenetrating head injuries, the survivors are often left withdebilitating neurological deficits due to contusions and diffuse axonalinjury.

FIG. 3 illustrates one example of a container device system. Accordingto various embodiments, protective gear includes multiple containerdevices 301 and 303. In particular embodiments, the multiple containerdevices are loosely interconnected shells holding an energy and impacttransformer 305. The multiple container devices may be multiple plasticand/or resin shells. In some examples, the containers devices 301 and303 may be connected only through the energy and impact transformer 305.In other examples, the container devices 301 and 303 may be looselyconnected in a manner supplementing the connection by the energy andimpact transformer 305.

According to various embodiments, the energy and impact transformer 305may use a shear truss-like structure connecting the container 301 andcontainer 303 to dampen any force or impact. In some examples, theenergy and impact transformer 305 allows the container 301 to move orslide with respect to container 303. In some examples, up to severalcentimeters of relative movement is allowed by the energy and impacttransformer 305.

In particular embodiments, the energy and impact transformer 305 couldbe a material that absorbs/dissipates mechanical energy as thermalenergy or transformational energy and may include electro-rheological,magneto-rheological, foam, fluid, and/or gel materials.

FIG. 4 illustrates another example of a container device system.Container 401 encloses energy and impact transformer 403. In someexamples, multiple containers or multiple shells may not be necessary.The container may be constructed using plastic and/or resin. And mayexpand or contract with the application of force. The energy and impacttransformer 403 may similarly expand or contract with the application offorce. The energy and impact transformer 403 may receive and convertenergy from physical impacts on a container 401.

FIG. 5 illustrates one example of a multiple shell system. An outershell 501, a middle shell 503, and an inner shell 505 may hold energyand impact transformative layers 511 and 513 between them. Energy andimpact transformer layer 511 residing between shells 501 and 503 mayallow shell 501 to move and/or slide with respect to middle shell 503.By allowing sliding movements that convert potential head rotationalforces into heat or transformation energy, shear forces can besignificantly reduced.

Similarly, middle shell 503 can move and slide with respect to innershell 505. In some examples, the amount of movement and/or slidingdepends on the viscosity of fluid in the energy and impact transformerlayers 511 and 513. The viscosity may change depending on electric fieldor voltage applied. In some other examples, the amount of movementand/or sliding depends on the materials and structures of materials inthe energy and impact transformer layers 511 and 513.

According to various embodiments, when a force is applied to an outershell 501, energy is transferred to an inner shell 505 through asuspended middle shell 503. The middle shell 503 shears relative to thetop shell 501 and inner shell 505. In particular embodiments, the energyand impact transformer layers 511 and 513 may include thin elastomerictrusses between the shells in a comb structure. The energy and impacttransformer layers 511 and 513 may also include energydampening/absorbing fluids or devices.

According to various embodiments, a number of different physicalstructures can be used to form energy and impact transformer layers 511and 513. In some examples, energy and impact transformer layer 511includes a layer of upward or downward facing three dimensional conicalstructures separating outer shell 501 and middle shell 503. Energy andimpact transformer layer 513 includes a layer of upward or downwardfacing conical structures separating middle shell 503 and inner shell505. The conical structures in energy and impact transformer layer 511and the conical structures in energy and impact transformer layer 513may or may not be aligned. In some examples, the conical structures inlayer 511 are misaligned with the conical structures in layer 513 toallow for improved shear force reduction.

In some examples, conical structures are designed to have a particularelastic range where the conical structures will return to the samestructure after force applied is removed. The conical structures mayalso be designed to have a particular plastic range where the conicalstructure will permanently deform if sufficient rotational or shearforce is applied. The deformation itself may dissipate energy but wouldnecessitate replacement or repair of the protective gear.

Conical structures are effective in reducing shear, rotational, andimpact forces applied to an outer shell 501. Conical structures reduceshear and rotational forces applied from a variety of differentdirections. According to various embodiments, conical structures inenergy and impact transformer layers 511 are directed outwards withbases situated on middle shell 503 and inner shell 505 respectively. Insome examples, structures in the energy and impact transformer layer maybe variations of conical structures, including three dimensional pyramidstructures and three dimensional parabolic structures. In still otherexamples, the structures may be cylinders,

FIG. 6 illustrates one example of a multiple shell helmet. According tovarious embodiments, helmet 601 includes an outer shell layer 603, anouter energy and impact transformer 605, a middle shell layer 607, aninner energy and impact transformer 609, and an inner shell layer 611.The helmet 601 may also include a lining layer within the inner shelllayer 611. In particular embodiments, the inner shell layer 611 includesattachment points 615 for a chin strap for securing helmet 601. Inparticular embodiments, the outer shell layer 603 includes attachmentpoints for a visor, chin bar, face guard, face cage, and/or faceprotection mechanism 615 generally. In some examples, the inner shelllayer 611, middle shell layer 607, and outer shell layer 603 includesridges 617 and/or air holes for breathability. The outer shell layer603, middle shell layer 607, and inner shell layer 611 may beconstructed using plastics, resins, metal, composites, etc. In someinstances, the outer shell layer 603, middle shell layer 607, and innershell layer 611 may be reinforced using fibers such as aramids. Theenergy and impact transformer layers 605 and 609 can help distributemechanical energy and shear forces so that less energy is imparted onthe head.

According to various embodiments, a chin strap 621 is connected to theinner shell layer 611 to secure helmet positioning. The various shelllayers are also sometimes referred to as containers or casings. In manyexamples, the inner shell layer 611 covers a lining layer (not shown).The lining layer may include lining materials, foam, and/or padding toabsorb mechanical energy and enhance fit. A lining layer may beconnected to the inner shell layer 611 using a variety of attachmentmechanisms such as glue or Velcro. According to various embodiments, thelining layer is pre-molded to allow for enhanced fit and protection.According to various embodiments, the lining layer may vary, e.g. from 4mm to 40 mm in thickness, depending on the type of activity a helmet isdesigned for. In some examples, custom foam may be injected into afitted helmet to allow for personalized fit. In other examples,differently sized shell layers and lining layers may be provided forvarious activities and head sizes.

The middle shell layer 607 may only be indirectly connected to the innershell layer 611 through energy and impact transformer 609. In particularembodiments, the middle shell layer 607 floats above inner shell layer611. In other examples, the middle shell layer 607 may be looselyconnected to the inner shell layer 611. In the same manner, outer shelllayer 603 floats above middle shell layer 607 and may only be connectedto the middle shell layer through energy and impact transformer 605. Inother examples, the outer shell layer 603 may be loosely and flexiblyconnected to middle shell layer 607 and inner shell layer 611. The shelllayers 603, 607, and 611 provide protection against penetrating forceswhile energy and impact transformer layers 605 and 609 provideprotection against compression forces, shear forces, rotational forces,etc. According to various embodiments, energy and impact transformerlayer 605 allows the outer shell 603 to move relative to the middleshell 607 and the energy and impact transformer layer 609 allows theouter shell 603 and the middle shell 607 to move relative to the innershell 611. Compression, shear, rotation, impact, and/or other forces areabsorbed, deflected, dissipated, etc., by the various layers.

According to various embodiments, the skull and brain are not onlyprovided with protection against skull fractures, penetrating injuries,subdural and epidural hematomas, but also provided with some measure ofprotection against direct forces and resultant coup-contra coup injuriesthat result in both contusions and compression-tension axon injuries.The skull is also protected against rotational forces that are a corecause of a shear injury and resultant long-term neurological disabilityin civilian and military personnel.

In some examples, the energy and impact transformer layers 605 and 609may include passive, semi-active, and active dampers. According tovarious embodiments, the outer shell 603, middle shell 607, and theinner shell 611 may vary in weight and strength. In some examples, theouter shell 603 has significantly more weight, strength, and structuralintegrity than the middle shell 607 and the inner shell 611. The outershell 603 may be used to prevent penetrating forces, and consequentlymay be constructed using higher strength materials that may be moreexpensive or heavier.

Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail forpurposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent that certainchanges and modifications may be practiced within the scope of theappended claims. Therefore, the present embodiments are to be consideredas illustrative and not restrictive and the invention is not to belimited to the details given herein, but may be modified within thescope and equivalents of the appended claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A helmet comprising: an outer protective shell;an inner protective shell connected to the outer protective shellthrough a first energy transformer layer; the first energy transformerlayer including a plurality of elastomeric structures residing betweenthe outer protective shell and the inner protective shell, the firstenergy transformer layer associated with a shear mechanism, wherein theshear mechanism is operable to absorb energy from forces imparted ontothe outer protective shell and allows the outer protective shell toslide relative to the inner protective shell; and a liner layerconnected to the inner protective shell, the liner layer configured toreside between the inner protective shell and a human head.
 2. Thehelmet of claim 1, wherein the elastomeric structures comprise aplurality of elastomeric trusses.
 3. The helmet of claim 1, wherein theelastomeric structures comprise a first absorptive/dissipative material.4. The helmet of claim 1, wherein the elastomeric structures comprise aplurality of structures are maintained in a comb structure.
 5. Thehelmet of claim 1, wherein the elastomeric structures comprise aplurality of connective structures connecting the outer protective shellto the inner protective shell.
 6. The helmet of claim 1, wherein theelastomeric structures comprise a plurality of elastic bands connectingthe outer protective shell from the inner protective shell.
 7. Thehelmet of claim 1, wherein the helmet comprises a plurality of foamelements between the outer protective shell and the inner protectiveshell, the plurality of foam elements including a low friction side. 8.The helmet of claim 1, wherein an accordion element connects the outerprotective shell to the inner protective shell.
 9. Headgear comprising:an outer protective shell; an inner protective shell connected to theouter protective shell through a first energy transformer layer, whereinthe inner protective shell is added to the headgear; the first energytransformer layer including a plurality of elastomeric structuresresiding between the outer protective shell and the inner protectiveshell, the first energy transformer layer associated with a shearmechanism, wherein the shear mechanism is operable to absorb energy fromforces imparted onto the outer protective shell and allows the outerprotective shell to slide relative to the inner protective shell; and aliner layer connected to the inner protective shell, the liner layerconfigured to reside between the inner protective shell and a humanhead.
 10. The headgear of claim 9, wherein the elastomeric structurescomprise a plurality of elastomeric trusses.
 11. The headgear of claim9, wherein the elastomeric structures comprise a firstabsorptive/dissipative material.
 12. The headgear of claim 9, whereinthe elastomeric structures comprise a plurality of structures aremaintained in a comb structure.
 13. The headgear of claim 9, wherein theelastomeric structures comprise a plurality of connective structuresconnecting the outer protective shell to the inner protective shell. 14.The headgear of claim 9, wherein the elastomeric structures comprise aplurality of elastic bands connecting the outer protective shell fromthe inner protective shell.
 15. The headgear of claim 9, wherein theheadgear comprises a plurality of foam elements between the outerprotective shell and the inner protective shell, the plurality of foamelements including a low friction side.
 16. The headgear of claim 9,wherein an accordion element connects the outer protective shell to theinner protective shell.
 17. A method for constructing a helmet, themethod comprising: attaching a first energy transformer layer and aninner protective shell to an outer protective shell, the first energytransformer layer including a plurality of elastomeric structuresresiding between the outer protective shell and the inner protectiveshell, the first energy transformer layer associated with a shearmechanism, wherein the shear mechanism is operable to absorb energy fromforces imparted onto the outer protective shell and allows the outerprotective shell to slide relative to the inner protective shell; andattaching a liner layer to the inner protective shell, the liner theliner layer configured to reside between the inner protective shell anda human head.
 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the elastomericstructures comprise a plurality of elastomeric trusses.
 19. The methodof claim 17, wherein the helmet comprises a plurality of foam elementsbetween the outer protective shell and the inner protective shell, theplurality of foam elements including a low friction side.
 20. The methodof claim 17, wherein an accordion element connects the outer protectiveshell to the inner protective shell.